LRASM Successfully launches from US Navy Ship

Discussion in 'U.S. Navy' started by Pathfinder, Jul 21, 2016.

Share This Page

  1. Pathfinder

    Pathfinder Lieutenant Colonel

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    1,406
    Likes Received:
    2,436
    Location:
    United-States
    Lockheed Martin Demonstrates LRASM’s Surface Launch Capabilities


    mfc-lrasm-pr2-h.jpg

    ORLANDO, Fla., July 21, 2016
    – Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) recently conducted a successful controlled flight test of the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) surface-launch variant from the Self Defense Test Ship at Pt. Mugu Sea Range, California.

    This was the third successful surface-launched LRASM test, proving the missile’s ability to load mission data using the modified Tactical Tomahawk Weapon Control System (TTWCS+), align mission data with the moving ship and launch from the MK 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS). During the test, LRASM exited the VLS launcher, cleanly separated from its Mk-114 booster and transitioned to the cruise phase. The missile successfully flew a pre-planned low-altitude profile collecting aerodynamics agility data while enroute to its pre-determined endpoint.

    This successful flight test demonstrates Lockheed Martin’s readiness to answer the U.S. Navy’s need for new anti-surface warfare capabilities as part of the ‘distributed lethality’ concept,” said Scott Callaway, LRASM Surface-Launch director at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. “This LRASM flight test from a U.S. Navy surface ship VLS highlights the successful collaboration between Lockheed Martin and the U.S. Navy.”

    To support this test, Lockheed Martin invested internal funds to provide an operational LRASM and to refurbish the Navy’s Self Defense Test Ship MK 41 VLS. This demonstration from a moving ship in a dynamic at-sea environment was a critical step in proving the maturity of the surface-launch variant. LRASM was also tested successfully from a ground-based MK 41 VLS “Desert Ship” in 2013 and 2014. Integrating LRASM with the VLS will provide every Aegis destroyer and cruiser with a long-range, survivable anti-surface warfare distributed lethality capability.

    The surface-launch LRASM variant was built on the same production line as JASSM, JASSM-ER and LRASM air-launch weapons, and delivers the same long-range, precision capability. With maturity of the MK 41 VLS integration demonstrated, Lockheed Martin will continue testing on other surface ship applications, including topside, deck-mounted launchers.

    LRASM is a precision-guided anti-ship missile that leverages the successful JASSM-ER heritage, and is designed to meet the needs of U.S. Navy and Air Force warfighters in a robust anti-access/area-denial threat environment. The air-launched variant provides an early operational capability for the Navy’s offensive anti-surface warfare Increment I requirement to be integrated onboard the U.S. Air Force’s B-1B in 2018 and on the U.S. Navy’s F/A-18E/F Super Hornet in 2019.

    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/ne...rates-LRASMs-surface-launch-capabilities.html
     
  2. AMDR

    AMDR Captain Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2015
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    868
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    United-States
    I wonder why they are waiting until 2023-2024 to hold the OASuW II competition. It is pretty clear that the LRASM is going to win when it has to go up against weapons like the Tomahawk and NSM. We need this capability on our ships now, the A2/AD threat is only going to get worse.

    The Tomahawk has the range but not the survivability. The NSM has the survivability but not the range. the LRASM is the perfect compromise between these two weapons.

    Put it on the LCS too. Why not?
    http://www.scout.com/military/warrior/story/1675704-navy-lrasm-weapon-to-fire-from-deck-launcher
     
    Pathfinder likes this.
  3. Pathfinder

    Pathfinder Lieutenant Colonel

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    1,406
    Likes Received:
    2,436
    Location:
    United-States
    Apparently there are two procurements, one was an immediate procurement and one is scheduled for later as you said, it needs to be able to be fired from naval vessels. I don't really get it either, afaik all of the missiles in the competition now have that capability. I don't see why we need to wait this much longer, just pick one and get it over with. The chinese aren't going to slow down and wait for us. Look how far they have advanced their objectives in the Pacific in just the last few years.

    http://whitefleet.net/2016/01/19/overview-of-oasuw-and-lrasm/
     
    AMDR likes this.
Loading...